Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

With

regards

Fix the agreement mistake

regard

show examples

to environmental pollution, elites debate that the only practical measure to come up with

this

Linking Words

issue is for the government to enforce recycling by

laws

Use synonyms

. I reckon

this

Linking Words

approach is effective, yet has pros and cons. The first and foremost is the advantages, legal support for recycling stimulates collaborations in society. All walks of life, who are putting the

laws

Use synonyms

into practice, can turn to each other to become partners and share the job.

For instance

Linking Words

, A mechanic may turn to a truck driver to relocate his waste to recycling sites and in return, he repairs the other one's vehicle.

As a result

Linking Words

, both will enjoy saving money.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, there are some drawbacks, it is highly likely to provoke financial corruption among the public and the authorities. There are always bad actors in the community who find the

laws

Use synonyms

do not fulfil their ambitions,

therefore

Linking Words

, they are willing to break the

laws

Use synonyms

. They are highly likely to turn to the authorities, and in exchange for money ask them to bypass the regulation.

For example

Linking Words

, an individual who is already suffering from taxes,

instead

Linking Words

of investing hugely in his home facilities, spends money to persuade local authorities to ignore his waste. In conclusion, legal enforcement for recycling is beneficial for the country which brings about partnerships.

However

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

approach requires deliberate practice since it may lead to financial corruption.