The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

According to

many people, the usage of mobile

phones

is against social ethics as it is for smoking. They prefer that mobile

phones

should be banned in certain areas just like smoking is banned. From my perspective, I strongly support

this

statement,

however

, I will be discussing both points of view with the support of some relevant examples. To commence with, mobiles are the greatest invention in the technology and have several uses.

This

helps you to connect with people who are living overseas.

However

,

this

can be dangerous if the person gets addicted to them. There are so many places, that need to ban the

use

of digital devices. One of the major instances is schools. The government should take action and ban the

use

of cells on the school campus. State

this

statement, there are many reasons why the rate of students involved in playing games at the time of studies is increasing drastically. They prefer to

use

the phone over study and

this

can affect their career greatly.

In contrast

, a ban on the electronic device may not be completely possible.

Therefore

, they must restrict the usage of cellular

phones

, especially in some of the monuments and places that have historical importance.

For instance

, there are many monuments that have restricted the

use

of cell

phones

inside the monument. One of them is the Akshardham Temple of Delhi, which

have

Correct subject-verb agreement

has

show examples

some strict rules for operating

phones

inside the temple. The reason is that people prefer to take pictures and make videos

instead

of enjoying the architecture of monuments.

To conclude

, many places are there that should prohibit the utilization of

this

technology

while

some prefer to restrict it for some period of time.