Some people think that the government is wasting money on the art and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Spending on

government

's money on art is considered a waste so

according to

some there could be other alternatives to spend money on. In my opinion, I agree that authorities ought to spend more on other valuable

sectors

than the

arts

as it will greatly benefit

society

.

This

essay will discuss the reasons that support to above statement like allocation of priorities and

return

to the

society

. A good reason to get rid of spending on

arts

is that it is the

government

's duty to prioritise their expenses on fundamental units rather than on

arts

.

This

is because, limited resources should be directed toward the most pressing needs

such

as healthcare, education and infrastructure. In

this

way, they are able to manage the

government

's expenditure exclusively. Since the governing bodies have their own priorities, private

sectors

can be encouraged to provide donations and scholarships which will help to improve

this

sector. Another point to consider is that funding for things like

arts

provides no

return

to

society

compared with others. It is an economic concern that people believe, the

arts

do not generate a sufficient

return

on investment in terms of economic growth and job creation

while

other

sectors

provide more tangible and economic benefits. In conclusion, funding for other valuable

sectors

than

arts

is a must for any country because prioritising expenses is vital to any

government

as it contributes a significant

return

to

society

that people demand the most. The cost of beneficial areas will be recouped many times over by the benefits it brings.