Some people think that history has nothing or little to tell us, but others believe that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

While

it is true that studying

History

can be full of ambiguity and take a long

time

, it is not clear whether It would benefit us or not. There has been a consensus among numbers of the public that studying

History

would be highly beneficial.

In contrast

, some other groups of people uphold the opposite idea because of some drawbacks that it can bring with itself,

for example

, it can stop society from adapting to new circumstances. The legitimacy of both of these points of view is crystal clear to me,

Nonetheless

, I think studying

History

can be a huge boon to humankind. One key benefit of reading about past

time

is not repeating the same mistakes. As humans we have changed a lot during our evolution, but not enough to neglect our

time

entirely. Whether we like it or not we are mortal and we are highly susceptible to repeating many mistakes

due to

lack of experience, in order to stand on the shoulders of giants we need to read

history

. One tangible example is the

history

of our antecedent failures in science, and by reading some limited papers we can save a lot of

time

.

On the other hand

, the major drawback of relying too much on

history

might lead communities to lose their future. As one delves into

history

, sometimes they would resist new solutions and try to use old findings in new situations. As I personally witnessed, some people in Saudi Arabia did not brush their teeth with regular brushes and they used some kind of special brush dated back to the first years of the Shamsi calendar, which they claim the Prophet Of Islam Mohammad used back

then

. Despite all the negative points, it is clear why many people strive to read

history

. By offering insight and knowledge to them, negative points depend on the humans' choice and we can simply choose differently.