Some people believe that the government spend too much money on wildlife protection projects and the money should be used for other things. Do you agree or disagree?

It has been argued for a long time that the

government

spends a lot of financial budgets protecting

wildlife

. I completely agree with

this

statement since I think the

government

should prioritize livelihood projects in front of

wildlife

protection programs. On the one hand, there are two main reasons that some governments spend a lot of cash protecting wild animals.

Firstly

, it has been found that the ecosystem has been destroyed

due to

the extinction of wild animals,

as a result

, it will have a negative impact on the living environment of human beings.

For example

,

Secondly

, people’s awareness of

wildlife

protection is significantly improved,

therefore

, the

government

try to win more votes from the public by spending a lot of money on

wildlife

protection tasks.

Although

it is crucial for humans to preserve

wildlife

, I do not support that the authorities should put more financial investments in

wildlife

preservation programs rather than improving livelihood projects

such

as fundamental infrastructure and youngsters’ education. The root cause of

wildlife

extinction is driven by human beings’ behaviours

such

as killing animals and destroying

wildlife

’s living environment so that they can earn money and get rid of the financial difficulties.

Therefore

, if the

government

invest more cash in building up bargain-priced flats for poor people to have a better living environment and increasing the quality of compulsory education to improve young people’s knowledge, people will not kill

wildlife

in order to survive. In conclusion, I agree that it is crucial to protect

wildlife

in terms of the authority’s sustainability duty but funds should cost more on the plans to enhance public life standards.