Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

Most

museums

have admission fees

while

others are free.

While

there are convenient reasons for advantages which are irrefutable. I personally vote for drawbacks

due to

the loss of the original purpose of their existence and the decrease in people's tendency to visit them. The disadvantages of

this

nation are irrefutable and will be discussed.

To begin

with, society will lose its enthusiasm to visit galleries when they have to pay an admission fee.

In other words

, these days there are more interesting activities that would pay for it

instead

of a gallery.

Hence

, it is impossible for some of them to pay

such

money which leads to exacerbate their passion.

Moreover

, admission fees will eliminate the main reason for the

museums

' existence which is knowledge nations about the history of human beings on Earth.

This

knowledge is attractive for folks as much as it is free. The advantages,

however

, cannot be overlooked. the income of

this

nation can be used for the maintenance of historical sites or stuff. To clarify, some

museums

need to take

this

fund because some unique stuff requires money to stay for a long time.

In addition

to money effort,

museums

need employees as well in order to give better services to their clients.

Therefore

, they are the source of income to hire people.

However

, these reasons are not logical to charge for entrance because of numerous non-profit organisations that support galleries.

To sum up

, many institutions have entrance fees

while

others are free.

While

there are convincing reasons in favour of the benefits of

this

resolution, I strongly vote for the disadvantages because of the loss of the original purpose of their existence and the decrease in people's tendency to visit them.