Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life? Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is often argued that celebrities should be respected by the
media
and have a private life,
while
others believe that being a famous person leads to the
media
group the right to invade their privacy. In my opinion, I believe that
although
the Newspaper, Radio, Television and social
media
have the right to base their work on fame, invading the private
lives
of those who achieved the highest point in their journeys becomes non-respectful behaviour from the
media
. A growing body of research suggests that magazines, Facebook and Instagram have a positive impact on famous people’s
lives
. One key benefit is that their achievement could be recognised all over the world, which can lead to an increase in their fame. Taking Lady Di (Princess Diana) as an example, she was celebrated in Newspapers, Television and the Internet for her unconventional approach to charity work with children and elderly people.
While
the connotation of the
media
content in its positive sight,
it is clear that
“Lady Di” was an inspiration for other famous to continue with
this
humble labour organizing similar groups of help for those in ultimate need providing food, aid and a roof to those that do not have enough resources.
However
, some other famous people did not have the same luck, where their fame had been affected just by a click. One important issue is that journalists tend to generate profit from the weak points of a famous life.
This
means that their work is based on the most kept secret and generates yellowish news.
For instance
, singers
such
as Britney Spears and Witney Houston had a hard time with their drug addictions, allowing journalists and freelance writers to catch the reader's attention and generate incredible amounts of money on behalf of the disgrace of the famous.
This
kind of content is the starting point for creating a moral code for journalists and internet writers to publish news positively. In conclusion,
while
journalist might publish famous achievements, they can
also
threaten their career. In my opinion, despite having a negative impact on celebrity's
lives
, I believe more in the positive aspects that uplift their careers.
However
, I would argue that the
media
should follow certain moral behaviours in order to protect famous people's private
lives
.
Submitted by mantonieta.albarracin on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Ensure that your essay fully addresses all parts of the task. Make sure to give balanced arguments for both views and clearly express your own opinion.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, work on linking your ideas more effectively to improve coherence and cohesion.
lexical resource
You have used a range of vocabulary, but some expressions are unclear and may not be suitable for an academic essay. Aim for clarity and precision in your word choice.
grammatical range
Your use of grammar is generally accurate; however, there are instances of awkward phrasing and errors in sentence structure. Review and refine your sentence structures for greater coherence.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: