People believe that not all school children have the natural ability to learn new language schools should not force school children to study a foreign language. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The graphical representation meticulously captures the nuanced dynamics of renewable
energy
integration within the broader context of total
energy
supply across four distinct nations during the temporal junctures of 1997, 2000, and 2010. Iceland emerges as a stalwart champion in its steadfast commitment to renewable sources, consistently outpacing its counterparts. Notably, the Icelandic trajectory exhibits a steady ascent, commencing at 45% in 1997, escalating to 60% in 2000, and ultimately reaching an impressive 70% by 2010.
In contrast
, Turkey's renewable
energy
narrative is marked by undulating figures. Hovering just below 40% in 1997, the percentage marginally surpassed 40% in 2000 before experiencing a measured descent to approximately 32% in 2010.
This
fluctuating pattern highlights the complexity of Turkey's journey in renewable
energy
utilization over the scrutinized period. Australia and Sweden,
however
, consistently find themselves in the lower echelons of the renewable
energy
spectrum. Australia's trajectory, starting at 9% in 1997, undergoes a gradual decline, bottoming out at 4% by 2010.
In contrast
, Sweden, commencing at 5% in 1997, demonstrates a continuous, albeit modest, upward trajectory, nearly doubling its initial percentage to reach 10% by the close of the examined decade in 2010. In summary, the graphical representation underscores Iceland's unwavering dedication to renewable
energy
, Turkey's oscillations, and the persistent lower percentages characterizing Australia and Sweden throughout the designated temporal intervals. The intricate interplay of these trajectories provides a comprehensive snapshot of each nation's evolving stance on renewable
energy
over the examined years.
Submitted by umark5353 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Ensure that each paragraph directly addresses the essay prompt to maintain a complete response.
coherence cohesion
Use transition words and phrases to improve the flow and coherence of the essay.
lexical resource
Diversify your vocabulary and consider incorporating more domain-specific terms related to energy and sustainability.
grammatical range
Work on using a variety of complex sentence structures to demonstrate a wider range of grammatical structures.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: