Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Due to

the reduction of greenhouse gas, the government should raise funding for

railways

and expand the rail network rather than motorway infrastructure. I totally agree

to

Change preposition

with

show examples

allocating investments in the rail industry

instead

of road-building. The investments in

railways

could benefit nations in introducing an eco-friendly way to commute.

As a result

of investing in

railways

, the state could cut down on the number of private vehicles and encourage people to use trains. The implication of

this

is to reduce car fume emissions, which devastatingly damage the atmosphere.

Moreover

, safety is deliberated if work labourers travel by trains, leading to fewer accidents than cars.

For instance

, some European countries recently

take

Wrong verb form

taken

show examples

track into account when they consider developing public facilities.

Besides

, the improvement of rail

line

Fix the agreement mistake

lines

show examples

can be a promising lever for attracting tourists.

In other words

, if the government granted the train facilities and rails, more and more passengers would be transported because a train is one of the fastest transportation

to

Fix the infinitive

apply

show examples

travel among regions. To illustrate

this

, Vietnam has poured money into

railways

to construct the Metro in the centre of the city, which will potentially be a remarkable feat for the transportation industry.

Therefore

,

this

can attract domestic and international tourists to visit the city so that the regional budget will be increased. In conclusion, despite the fact that many people still travel on roads every day, the investment in

railways

could be advantageous to some degree. In my opinion, fostering the

railways

may lead to the restriction on air pollutant release and incentivize people to use trains frequently.