Some people claim that too much focus and resources have been spent to protect wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, most countries are making efforts to protect wildlife

animals

.

However

, it is argued that the government wastes a large amount of its budget and resources to save endangered

species

. I completely disagree with

this

point of view and in

this

essay, I will support my opinion with examples. To commence with, spending money and resources on the protection of

animals

is not sufficient because there is an ecological imbalance in the

environment

. To explain, every creature present in the

environment

is dependent on other creatures for their living and feeding, making a life cycle balance.

Therefore

, it becomes essential to pay attention towards endangered

animals

and birds.

For instance

, butterflies help in the pollination of plants but these days farmers opt for different alternatives of pollination as butterflies have almost disappeared from the

environment

. Another worth considering factor is the importance of

animals

and birds as sources of tourism and employment industry. To elaborate, there are many

species

which are on the verge of extinction, and just a few of those are protected in zoos and other safe places which are a great source of earning money when people from different parts of the world come to visit these kinds of places.

For example

, several

species

like cranes, vultures and parrots are at high risk of dying out because the authorities didn't realise and paid attention to their significance.

Hence

, the allocation of the budget is not enough to protect endangered

species

.

To conclude

, I believe that the contribution of authorities to protect wildlife is not enough and they must allocate more resources and money to save endangered

species

so that they can be beneficial for the tourism industry and ecological balance in the

environment

.