Some people think that the government should subsidize fruit and vegetables to make healthy food more affordable. Others argue that the government should tax unhealthy food instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion Gives reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge.
Health issues arising from consuming excessive amounts of junk food are a cause of great concern in many countries. There are calls for governments to either reduce the prices of healthy foodstuff through subsidies or to raise the costs of unhealthy products through taxation. In my opinion, a combination of the two is the best way forward.
Taxing unhealthy fare like sugary drinks makes them relatively more costly, potentially encouraging consumers to buy more healthy alternatives. Evidence shows that
such
taxes do reduce consumption of potentially harmful intake and that firms reformulate their products, with beneficial effects on health. Furthermore
, this
policy could be considered as a kind of punishment for those consumers contributing to an increase in the risk of obesity. For instance
, the so-called “sugar tax” imposed in the UK on soft drinks with a high sugar content has had some positive effects. However
, soft drink manufacturers have reacted by reducing sugar levels to just under the amount liable for the surcharge, as a result
, most people tend to buy this
slightly healthier version without being ready to change their overall
dietary habits.
Subsidizing healthy groceries such
as fruit and vegetables has, therefore
, been proposed as a policy that would represent a reward rather than a punishment. Indeed, this
strategy of passing price reductions directly on to the consumer seems to have a greater impact on eating habits, and it is also
an important step towards encouraging people to eat better. Of course, one drawback is that persuading governments to spend money, rather than collect it through taxation is sometimes no simple matter. In the UK, grocers selling fruit and vegetables receive a rebate in the total amount they pay HMRC according to
the amount of groceries, used as a subsidy to lower the prices they charge their customers.
To conclude
, I believe that the best way forward is to employ both strategies in tandem. Imposing a tax on unhealthy foods and drinks can discourage buyers from purchasing them and tax concessions can then
be used to partly fund the cost of fruit and vegetables, to consumers, thus
offering moreSubmitted by aesacademyforenglishstudy on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure there is a logical sequence in the presentation of your ideas. The flow from one paragraph to another can be improved by using more diverse connectors and transition phrases.
coherence cohesion
Make sure the introduction clearly presents the topic and your thesis, while the conclusion should restate the thesis and summarize the main points without introducing new information.
coherence cohesion
Support your main points with clear, developed arguments. Utilize data or specific examples where possible to strengthen your arguments.
task achievement
Provide a complete response to all parts of the task. Make sure you fully address both views stated in the prompt as well as give your own clear opinion on the issue.
task achievement
Present ideas in a clear and comprehensive manner. Avoid overgeneralizing and make points that are logically connected to the task at hand.
task achievement
Use relevant, specific examples to illustrate your points whenever possible. Doing so will give more weight to your arguments and demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic.