Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world, others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both this views and give your own opinion

There are two different points of view about scientific achievements.

First

Change the article

The first

show examples

group emphasizes the free publication of information for everyone.

On the other hand

,

second

Change the article

the second

show examples

group thinks that we don’t have to make some critical data available. The former sight follows an open-source policy which is closer to my perspective and the latter one has a more cautious policy. The first crowd thinks that we can

also

share everything with others, which is the definition of open-source policy and they believe that we can have a more scientific global society. With

this

action, we can positively affect others’ quality of life

as well as

we

Correct pronoun usage

apply

show examples

be influenced by them.

For instance

, whenever you share COVID-19's vaccine formulation, you save

humans

Fix the agreement mistake

human

show examples

lives and

in contrast

, the survivors

also

transfer artificial intelligence (AI) knowledge to control population density to prevent

covid's

Correct your spelling

COVID's

show examples

spread. The latter sight is based on a cautious view. Apart from the positive effects of publishing scientific data, humans have

also

had bitter experiences in the past. One of the most significant experiences was the invention of AI, which can be seen as the government's misuse of its potential in anti-humanitarian applications. Many countries,

instead

of using it to promote

human’s

Change noun form

human

show examples

welfare, used it to threaten each other. Some countries have increased their cyber-attacks when they have gotten

this

technology.

Moreover

, they have been using intelligent economic models to increase their political influence, which is very unfortunate. As I see, science itself has no damage to humanity but advantages, so, the issue is the way of usage. You can use the misuse of AI technology in cyber-attacks or

in appropriate

Correct your spelling

inappropriate

show examples

medical applications. With

this

reasoning, we come to the conclusion that the problem is human.

Therefore

, it is important to focus on human ethics

instead

of publishing restrictions. It is the United

Nations

Change noun form

Nations'

show examples

duty to implement plans in

this

regard to make the situation of information dissemination less risky.