As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that drivers should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The exponential proliferation of automobiles mandates considerable investment in
road
infrastructure. Although
some contend that the onus of these expenditures should rest upon the government, others argue that drivers
should share the financial responsibility. Both perspectives present compelling rationales, yet I believe that a combined effort encompassing both governmental entities and drivers
is crucial for sustaining road
systems
.
On one hand, advocates of government funding for road
systems
posit the broader societal benefits of well-maintained infrastructure. In brief, roads are a public good that facilitates commerce, trade, and interconnectedness, contributing to economic prosperity. By allocating tax revenue to road
construction and maintenance, the governing bodies ensure that all citizens can access safe and efficient transportation networks.
On the other hand
, opponents contend that those who directly utilize the road
system should share the financial burden. Enforcing tolls, congestion levies, or fuel tariffs allows drivers
to contribute commensurate with their usage, ensuring a fair and proportionate allocation of costs. This
approach also
incentivizes individuals to opt for sustainable transportation options, reducing traffic congestion and environmental impact.
In my opinion, an integrative strategy that synergizes governmental funding with driver contributions is optimal. While
governments play a pivotal role in upholding equitable access to road
systems
– particularly in economically disadvantaged regions, drivers
should partake in the upkeep of the infrastructure they rely on – as this
promotes conscientious and sustainable usage.
In conclusion, despite the fiscal obligation for road
systems
involves a nuanced interplay between governmental allocations and motorists’ contributions, I firmly agree that by striking a harmonious balance between these approaches, societies can achieve impeccably upheld, efficient, and sustainable transportation frameworks that yield benefits for both individuals and the broader community.Submitted by ashissarker18 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
introduction conclusion present
Your essay does present a clear introduction and conclusion, which helps to identify your stance on the matter. However, the introduction could be more concise and focused to immediately inform the reader about the topic and the structure of the essay.
relevant specific examples
The essay would have benefitted from using more specific examples to support the points being made. Providing detailed scenarios or citing concrete studies would strengthen your arguments significantly
complete response
While you have attempted to address the prompt by discussing two views and providing your opinion, the development of the views was not fully realized. Aim to develop each view more thoroughly, and ensure your opinion is prominent throughout the essay, not just at the conclusion
clear comprehensive ideas
The ideas are fairly clear and comprehensive, but be careful with overly complex sentences that may obscure the meaning. Aim for precision and clarity to enhance the effectiveness of your communication.
logical structure
The logical structure of the essay is generally sound, but at times ideas may flow better with transitional phrases and clearer topic sentences. Make sure each paragraph begins with a topic sentence that indicates what the paragraph will discuss, and use transitional phrases to guide the reader more smoothly through your argumentation.
supported main points
There is a good attempt at supporting your main points; however, they require further development and support through concrete examples and explanations. Each main point should be elaborated upon with significant details to make your argument stronger.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.