Death penalty is still practiced in jurisdiction system of many countries. Some people believe that this type of punishment should be abolished. However, others are of opposite opinion. Discuss both sides of this debate and give your own opinion

In the realm of global jurisprudence, the contentious practice of the

death

penalty

persists across the jurisdictional systems of numerous countries. The ongoing debate hinges on whether

this

form of punishment should be abolished, with one faction arguing against it

due to

ethical and practical concerns,

while

the opposing side asserts the necessity of retaining capital punishment in extreme cases.

This

essay seeks to explore these divergent perspectives, offering an analysis of the arguments on both sides before concluding with a personal stance on the matter. Supporters of abolishing the

death

penalty

highlight its ethical and systemic shortcomings. They contend that the execution of individuals, even those convicted of heinous crimes, perpetuates a cycle of violence without addressing the root causes.

Moreover

, the potential for judicial errors leading to the wrongful execution of innocents raises moral questions about the viability of

such

a punitive system.

Instead

, they advocate for a justice system that prioritizes rehabilitation and societal harmony over vengeance.

Conversely

, proponents of the

death

penalty

argue for its retention in extreme cases,

such

as serial murder or terrorism. They posit that certain crimes demand the most severe consequences as a deterrent and a means to protect

society

. In their view, capital punishment ensures that

society

is rid of individuals deemed beyond rehabilitation, serving both as retribution and a preventive measure against potential future atrocities. In conclusion, the

death

penalty

debate encompasses complex ethical, moral, and societal considerations.

While

opponents emphasize the need for a more humane and rehabilitative approach to justice, proponents highlight the gravity of certain crimes and the necessity for stringent consequences. Personally, I align with the abolitionist perspective, believing that a

society

's commitment to justice should not be synonymous with the act of taking human life.

This

nuanced and compassionate approach is vital for fostering a

society

that values both accountability and rehabilitation.