Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while others think is a good idea. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Government

jobs carry with them serious responsibilities. It is

therefore

no surprise that a person’s age and

experience

come under scrutiny when

positions

in

government

need to be filled. Many feel influential

government

jobs should be reversed for those who are older and have more

experience

,

while

others feel the same criterion for those

positions

should be capability, namely whomever is most able to carry out the job.

This

essay will look at both sides drawing a logical conclusion. On the one hand, many argue that younger people should be made ineligible for important

government

positions

, and the implications of

this

opinion are clear. Those operating at senior levels within a country’s military,

for example

, require field

experience

to prevent disastrous decisions that could cause the needless loss of life. Were younger people allowed to fast-track their ascension within a country’s military, they could find themselves having to make critical choices based on theoretical study

than

Rephrase

rather than

show examples

practical

experience

, and

this

could have catastrophic results.

Thus

, it is understandable why many feel younger

government

workers should be incubated to important

positions

.

However

, there are several plausible counters to

this

argument. For one, younger workers bring creativity and fresh ideas to

government

.

For instance

, young

government

workers in Canada successfully pushed to increase HIV understanding and dispel stigmas attached to the disease in the 1980s, a development that encouraged tolerance and reduced irrational fear.

In addition

to fresh ideas, it should be remembered that to get a

government

job, one has to successfully

engagein

Correct your spelling

engage in

engage

arigorous

Correct your spelling

a rigorous

rigorous

screening process. If a younger person engages in

this

process as well or better than an older person, it is hard to argue that age should be a decisive factor when offering employment.

It is clear that

these reasons that there is merit to awarding important

government

career options to younger people.

Although

the above look reveals solid evidence for both sides of the argument, it is felt that the healthiest approach to designating

government

positions

is to ensure candidates fulfil rigorous training programs.

Thus

, a person’s age should not be considered a universal precursor to the awarding of

government

jobs.