Governments should spend on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
While
there are a lot
of people who agree that the government
should allocate its budget
to railways
, I disagree because I think roads
are more efficient compared to railways
. Roads
can approach small areas and are easier to maintain. Plus, roads
will also
cost less in terms of construction. On the other hand
, railways
are less flexible because building them will cause high expenses and will take a long time.
Building roads
has a lot
of advantages. Firstly
, roads
are easier to use for a lot
of people. These days, almost everybody has a car. It could be more than one car for the average person in the city. Hence
, in order to approach one location, roads
are easier to use for these people. Secondly
, roads
can also
approach small areas, for instance
, villages and remote areas. Villages tend to have compact space. Thus
, in order to go to these villages, using roads
will be the best option. Roads
are also
easier to maintain since the heavy equipment that will be used to repair them is easier to procure. Finally
, building roads
will impact in
less Change preposition
apply
budget
. It is due to
the cheap raw materials and labor
.
Change the spelling
labour
On the contrary
, constructing railways
has several drawbacks. It
is mainly because building Correct pronoun usage
This
railways
will lead to high costs. The expense of building railways
can be up to 50% higher compared to building roads
. Another reason is that the raw materials for railways
such
as steel and rock are expensive. Also
, the government
must hire a reputable engineering consultant which will take a lot
of money. Moreover
, building railways
will take a lot
of time, which is up to 2 years longer compared to building roads
.
In conclusion, I think the government
should allocate its budget
more to roads
compared to railways
. It is because roads
are easier to use, more flexible, and can impact on less budget
for the government
. On the other hand
, railways
are not preferred because they will lead to high expense
and will take Fix the agreement mistake
expenses
longer
time to construct.Correct article usage
a longer
Submitted by nadillamntr on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Introduction & Conclusion
You have provided a basic structure with a clear introduction and conclusion. However, the introduction could benefit from a stronger thesis statement that explicitly outlines your main points. The conclusion sums up your arguments but could re-emphasize the significance of the topic.
Logical Structure
The essay shows some logical structure, with paragraphs dedicated to different ideas. Work on your transitions to help the reader follow your line of thought more easily. The use of cohesive devices needs to be more sophisticated and varied.
Supporting Main Points
You have expressed clear ideas that relate to the topic but you should develop your arguments further with more detailed examples and evidence. Vague statements such as 'cheap raw materials and labour' could be backed by specific facts or studies to strengthen your argument.
Completing the Response
Ensure that the response fully addresses the task by discussing both views, not just the one you agree with. Your essay could also benefit from examining the potential benefits of railways to present a more balanced argument.
Clear & Comprehensive Ideas
Clarify and elaborate upon your main ideas by expanding on how roads provide efficiency and flexibility. You may also want to consider counterarguments to show a deeper understanding of the topic.
Relevant Specific Examples
To improve the score in this area, include more detailed and relevant examples to support your claims. Current examples are somewhat basic and could be enhanced by referencing real-world scenarios, comparative studies between road and rail costs, or expert opinions on transport infrastructure.