Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere, while others believe this is just the price of fame. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Although

many people believe that

paparazzi

should not focus on the celebrity's privacy, few reveal that there is a price value for their fame in sharing photographs on social platforms. I state that they should not reveal the privacy of a star person

such

as actors.

However

, it is prons and cons to have a debate on

this

paparazzi

topic that will provide some views, reasons and examples in the following paragraphs. On the one hand,

paparazzi

take photographs of actos by hiding and sharing their activities on social media.

This

is because they get paid and survive their family life but they should not go beyond boundaries to get extra bonuses.

Likewise

, they could post the private details of famous actors by getting extra dollars.

For instance

, in recent years, television telecasted many reality-based stories

such

as gangsters and criminal activity found in movie cinemas which did not involve any celebrity.

Thus

,

paparazzi

can ruin someone's life by blackmailing and sharing vulgar pictures.

On the other hand

, the

paparazzi

ought to take photographs to make people models and viral on Instagram.

This

is because individuals get a chance to showcase their abilities to the audience and can be a role model.

For example

, in

this

era, many youngsters have found easy ways to find bloggers or

paparazzi

that will help them go viral quickly by showing innovative techniques.

Hence

,

paparazzi

can be beneficial to others for the price of fame. In conclusion, the

paparazzi

can destroy individuals' lives and make them celebrities too but, in my opinion, I would support that they should not have a right to reveal the privacy of individuals without authorization.