To some, the animals living in the wildlife should not be protected, and doing so is considered throwing resources out the window. I strongly disagree with
this
statement. Wildlife is beautiful and can provide a lot to humans , and our responsibility is to protect the creatures in danger from the damage we cause.
Linking Words
Firstly
, the beasts need to be sheltered from any human activity that could disturb their well-being. They obviously provide a lot to our society, for many reasons. One of them is that they tend to be very elegant and beautiful, which encourages people to observe them, either on television or in real life. Many depend on the tourism brought by Linking Words
this
wildlife. Linking Words
For instance
, many African countries, Linking Words
such
as Uganda, base a part of their economy on Linking Words
the
safaris and visitors willing to discover the richness of the world.
Correct article usage
apply
Secondly
, not only do humans have a responsibility for their protection, but they are Linking Words
also
part of the earth, where no one has the right to consider whether a living being should live or not. Linking Words
Furthermore
, Humans have caused many troubles for creatures. Linking Words
For example
, in the Mauritius Islands, the Dodo birds once lived, which our ancestors ended up exterminating, since they were easy to chase. Linking Words
Then
, no criteria can justify whether an animal has a place in our world. The human is a living being among others , and no hierarchy should exist.
In conclusion, I wholeheartedly think that we are highly illegitimate to choose by ourselves. The thesis seems illogical since we are not ourselves in the debate , and Linking Words
that is
why I disagree. Many species will outlive ours. In my opinion, it is important to reconsider our place in the world.Linking Words