The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal berween 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

#carbon #dioxide #co #emissions #person #kingdom #sweden #berween #summarise #information #features #comparisons

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?

A glance at the line graph presents the average of carbon emissions per capita in four European countries namely Great Britain, Sweden, Italy and Portugal, from 1967 to 2007.

Overall

Linking Words

, it is evident that the figures for the United Kingdom and Sweden underwent downward trends,

while

Linking Words

the remaining two witnessed steady growth. Despite experiencing a notable decrease, British citizens still recorded the highest individual carbon pollutants on average throughout the period given. To commence, the United Kingdom constituted the biggest carbon dioxide (CO2) release in 1967 at around 11

tonnes

Use synonyms

. The number went down gradually to reach its lowest point at approximately 9

tonnes

Use synonyms

On the other hand

Linking Words

, the average number of gas emissions in Sweden began at 8

tonnes

Use synonyms

and grew to 10

tonnes

Use synonyms

in a decade.

Subsequently

Linking Words

, the number fell dramatically between 1977 and 2007 to just below 6

tonnes

Use synonyms

Conversely

Linking Words

, the figure for Italy started at slightly above 4 in 1967. It increased steadily to around 8

tonnes

Use synonyms

and hovered around that level for the final two decades.

Likewise

Linking Words

, the average of gas pollutants per capita in Portugal was

initially

Linking Words

the lowest amongst the other three at approximately a ton, it went up significantly and culminated at about 5

tonnes

Use synonyms

Submitted by 2024successielts on Mon Dec 18 2023

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Sentences: Add more complex sentences.

▼

Vocabulary: Replace the words tonnes with synonyms.

▼

Vocabulary: The word "figures" was used 2 times.

▼

Vocabulary: The word "went down" was used 2 times.

▼

Vocabulary: The word "approximately" was used 2 times.

▼

Vocabulary: The word "around" was used 3 times.

▼

7
Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
1
Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0
Grammar mistakes
detected issues

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 9.0

Logical structure

Single idea per paragraph

Introduction & conclusion present

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 5.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 6.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 9.0

Complete response

Suitable writing tone

Appropriate word count

4 paragraphs

203 words

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

7.5
band
A lot of money is spent nowadays searching for oil. As the world's oil resources will eventually run out, it would be more logical to spend some of this money on developing new sources of power, such as wind and solar. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
At present, natural oil is the primary source of energy that powers the world economy. However, there is a notion that the world has been spending excessively on oil exploration, and it suggests that the money should be utilised in a better way to fund innovations that could generate alternative energy sources such as wind and solar power. I totally agree with the idea that we should spend more money to develop renewable sources of power because it would mitigate the effects of global climate change.
5.5
band
One of the widely discussed topics nowadays is that Computers are basis of modern world. It is undeniable that computers have become an essential part of our life.
One of the widely discussed topics nowadays is that Computers are basis of modern world. It is undeniable that computers have become an essential part of our life. However, there is no absolute agreement of whether they should be introduced into classrooms for teaching purposes or not.
7
band
In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. why people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food?
There is a growing global trend where citizens prefer to allocate their budget towards purchasing foreign groceries, especially food, rather than opting for local alternatives. The writer believes this stems from the fact that certain fruits and vegetables cannot be grown by local farmers. And the government can aid domestic agriculture products by charging more for imported food.
6.5
band
In today’s digital age, anyone with a smartphone can capture and share photographs. this accessibility to photography diminishes the value of professional photographers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals believe that, nowadays, anyone with a mobile phone can take and send photos. This availability of photography underestimates the value of professional photographers. This essay strongly disagrees with that statement because professional photographers use pro cameras to capture photos instead of phones, and pro photographers have greater experience of in taking photographs.
5
band
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion saying that protecting wild animals is a waste of time and efforts since they are not necessary anymore in the 21st century. Personally, I disagree with this statement for reasons outlined below. It is nonsense to say wild animals have no part in the 21st century since they always play an important role in the environment. Whether in the Stone Age, medieval age or modern age, animals, and plants have been living together and forming a balance in life that no humans can make. Plants give off oxygen and foods, while animals help plants grow and multiply. If we don’t protect wild animals well, most of them will go extinct due to overhunting, which will break the balance of nature and lead to many adverse consequences of deforestation, hurricane, and other terrible disasters. It takes resources to protect wild animals, but their existence will bring other benefits to the nations that preserve/conserve them. Wildlife, zoos and preservation/conservation areas that allo...

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal berween 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

A lot of money is spent nowadays searching for oil. As the world's oil resources will eventually run out, it would be more logical to spend some of this money on developing new sources of power, such as wind and solar. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

One of the widely discussed topics nowadays is that Computers are basis of modern world. It is undeniable that computers have become an essential part of our life.

In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. why people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food?

In today’s digital age, anyone with a smartphone can capture and share photographs. this accessibility to photography diminishes the value of professional photographers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?