Some people believe that the government should fund art and culture, while others think that is should only fund sciences. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

The debate regarding

government

expenditure has often

centered

Change the spelling

centred

show examples

around whether it is more beneficial to finance the arts and

culture

sector or solely focus on the scientific disciplines. I firmly agree that

government

funding should prioritize

art

and

culture

, as they are fundamental to

preserve

Wrong verb form

preserving

show examples

national

identity

and stimulating economic growth. Some advocate for exclusive

government

funding of sciences

due to

the tangible

benefits

in

Change preposition

of

show examples

technological advancement and health improvements. Proponents of

this

perspective argue that scientific

endeavors

Change the spelling

endeavours

show examples

offer measurable progress and practical

benefits

to society.

However

,

this

view overlooks the intrinsic value of cultural

identity

and the non-material

benefits

that

art

and

culture

provide upon a society.

For instance

,

while

scientific projects

such

as space exploration are exalted, they often do not provide immediate or widespread

benefits

to the general populace, unlike cultural initiatives that directly enhance communal life and cohesion. The support of

art

and

culture

by the

government

is essential, as these sectors are pillars of national

identity

and social unity.

Art

and cultural initiatives promote diversity, tolerance, and understanding among the populace, which is not typically a focus of scientific research.The funding of the Tumurun Museum, a cultural establishment, not only preserves a vast array of Indonesian heritage but

also

serves as an educational resource and tourist attraction, contributing to both cultural understanding and economic sustainability. The argument for exclusive science funding,

while

strong in its advocacy for progress, lacks recognition of the immediate cultural and societal

benefits

. The profound impact of

art

and

culture

on national

identity

and economic vitality is undeniable and deserves

government

funding. Given the comprehensive

benefits

of cultural enrichment to society,

it is clear that

government

funding should prioritize the arts and

culture

sector over science alone.