Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is no doubt that
people
in various countries have distinct and diverse viewpoints because everyone is a unique individual. Some people
contemplate if their friends
have the same wavelength as them, whilst others harbour a belief that friends
who possess the opposite opinions should bring about decent value. In this
essay, I will discuss both views and give my opinion.
Initially
, one of the main arguments in its favour is that friends
present the same perspectives and values not only have a lot of consensuses but also
bring about more enjoyment. What's more, it may bring about win-win results, if they have the same region and politics. To illustrate, acquaintances may build close-knit relationships while
the
y have the same personality, leading to mutual and supportive interactions. Hence
, people
get along well with those who always stand on their side and feel they have a strong backup.
At the other end of the spectrum, individuals may consider it more beneficial when somebody sometimes gainsays their own perspectives because people
are not always making the right decisions. Besides
, the way of considerations may be sparked off by the person who convinces people
to think outside the box, creating different but better results. According to
the aforementioned, the merit of contrasting opinions will trigger some favourable consequences.
To sum up
, despite the fact that choosing friends
who always have the same opinions as them has positive advantages.; however
, some believe it's efficient that having friends
who sometimes disagree with them indeed plays a pivotal role. Consequently
, I hold the statement of contenting of having friends
who sometimes refute my original contemplations may lead to a better result.Submitted by aa0963178783 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
The essay provided follows a basic structure but lacks consistency in establishing clear logical connections between ideas. To improve logical structure, ensure each paragraph follows a clear topic sentence and that subsequent sentences support the topic with clear examples and explanations. Avoid abrupt transitions, and use a variety of linking phrases to better connect your ideas.
coherence cohesion
While an introduction and conclusion are present, they do not effectively encapsulate the main argument or summary. Refine your introduction to clearly state the issue and your thesis. In the conclusion, succinctly restate your main points and thesis, providing a sense of closure.
coherence cohesion
Your main points are somewhat supported, but the supporting details and examples are not always clear or fully developed. To improve this, focus on expanding your points with specific examples, evidence, and further explanation to create more compelling arguments.
task achievement
You have addressed the task, but the response could be more complete. Make a more explicit comparison between the views and link this directly to the question. Make your own opinion clearer and distinguish it from the discussion of the other views. This will show a full response to the prompt.
task achievement
Your ideas are generally clear, but at times they could be more comprehensive. Provide a detailed explanation when presenting a viewpoint and explore the implications fully. This will demonstrate a clearer understanding and the ability to express complex ideas.
task achievement
The essay lacks specific and relevant examples to support points effectively. To improve task achievement, incorporate concrete examples that directly relate to the views discussed. This will illustrate your points more vividly and make your argument more persuasive.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.