Nowadays,
due to
the rise of job-immigration abroad, an argument has come to some people's minds that these individuals should be obligated to Linking Words
work
where they were trained; Use synonyms
while
others assume that they have the right to choose where they want to Linking Words
work
. Use synonyms
This
essay will analyze both views and I will indicate my own agreement with the latter.
On one hand, the first group may consider the fact that professionals had used the facilities and investments of their countries to become doctors, engineers, etc; and Linking Words
for
Linking Words
this
reason, they should remain and Linking Words
work
there. A student who has used the government's funds to study at universityUse synonyms
,
has to repay Remove the comma
apply
this
investment. Linking Words
For example
, in Iran, students who studied freely, have to Linking Words
work
in their Use synonyms
country
twice the time they have used Use synonyms
this
free education; Linking Words
otherwise
, they are obligated to pay back the whole money in case of going abroad and using their license.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, the second group argue that human beings have the right to choose another Linking Words
country
if they desire. They believe that being trained in a Use synonyms
country
does not mean that they should be stuck in it for their whole life. To clarify Use synonyms
this
, if a doctor is being offered a more beneficial job in another Linking Words
country
which Use synonyms
also
affects the quality of their personal life, they should have the right to decide without thinking of any pay-back. I tend to believe that Linking Words
this
view is more logical Linking Words
due to
human rights and freedom.
In conclusion, Linking Words
although
there might be convincing reasons for remaining where you were educated, I believe that forbidding individuals from working where they demand, is not humanistic and logical.Linking Words
Farzaneh Ka