Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is said that investment in
railways
is more significant than
roads
.
While
I believe that both
roads
and
railways
are significant, I prefer to agree with investing in
railways
due to
more people can be encouraged to use public transportation and
railways
are one of the main ways to transport goods.
To begin
with, Spending
money
on
railways
is essential as it has two major advantages. One benefit is that by rebuilding old and constructing new
railways
the government can stimulate people to use public transportation
such
as tram and underground.
This
measure leads to a reduction of traffic congestion and air pollution so citizens can enjoy breathing clear air.
In addition
, in the long
term
Add a comma
term,
show examples
it can prevent global warming and
consequently
stay off climate change.
Also
, since many industrial and chemical cargoes are transported through trains it is vital to spend
money
on them to hinder the likelihood of accidents. If
railways
aren'
t
in a suitable situation, moving things by them will be risky and cause inevitable loss of economy or it may be life-threatening for those who work in trains.
On the other hand
, I would argue that spending more
money
on
roads
isn'
t
as important as
railways
.
However
,
Roads
are one of the features that give a city an elegant view and offer people convenient driving. The more society enjoys driving private vehicles every day, the more Pollution and traffic jams will emerge and threaten their health. I don'
t
mean that
roads
shouldn'
t
be usable, I try to convey That Focusing just on
roads
may cause some detrimental impacts. In conclusion, in my opinion, paying
money
for
Railways
not only prevents problems related to the economy but
also
can cause folks to utilize
such
public transportation.
Submitted by kmibehnaz98 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

introduction conclusion present
Your introduction and conclusion are present, which is good, but they lack a clear statement of your position.
logical structure
supported main points
Main points are supported but could benefit from more varied and sophisticated language.
complete response
You addressed the task, provided a full response to the prompt, and presented clear ideas, but the position can be at times a bit vague. Make sure your opinion is clear and consistent throughout.
relevant specific examples
Added examples and data to support your arguments would help to make your essay more persuasive.
clear comprehensive ideas
Your ideas are clear, but they could be expressed using a wider range of structures and vocabulary.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: