In many parts of the world, the prevalence of committing crimes has been undergoing an upward trend, and it is said that the sole solution to reduce crime rates is an increase in the number of policemen on the streets. From my viewpoint, I hardly agree with
this
opinion because there are many other remedies which might be taken into account.
On the one hand, if more and more police were on the streets, people would likely not commit illegal activities because they hesitate to be caught. Pickpockets can be taken as a prime example; indeed, Linking Words
such
crime usually happens in crowded places where there is little supervision of the authority. Linking Words
Nevertheless
, Linking Words
this
idea requires a large number of people in charge and correspondingly there may be a leap in the budget for their salary. Ultimately, the discussed remedy is seemingly not prominent.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, the given problem can be addressed by many different methods. First and foremost, cameras and other advanced technologies, which are tremendously more cost-efficient, can supplant the police in supervising citizens. Linking Words
Moreover
, they can do Linking Words
such
repetitive and dull tasks so that authorities do have time to take responsibility for onerous ones. Linking Words
Second,
governments should Linking Words
also
raise public awareness about the dire consequences of criminal conduct; Linking Words
for example
, social campaigns should be implemented as a precaution. Linking Words
Hence
, as being conscious of punishment, almost everyone might opt to be upright citizens. Eventually, the two remedies are bound to be far better than the prior.
In conclusion, Linking Words
although
more policemen can help to alleviate the density of crimes, it is not the only solution. Linking Words
Instead
, it is recommended to take advantage of technological development and mass education.Linking Words
chungoc2001