Some children nowadays take sport seriously while others play sports in their free time. positive or negative trend

In

this

contemporary setting, some sections of children enrolled in regular exercise classes

whereas

others take sports as a hobby for spare time. Experts have a great debate about whether it is a rewarding transition or a detrimental one. I consider it a devastating development. My elaborated perspective will be discussed in the following paragraphs.

First,

an obvious drawback of

this

notion is depriving

kids

of playing freely and acquiring essential

life

skills. The early age of

life

is really crucial for

kids

, as they should be familiar with their surroundings.

Moreover

, they should allocate their time to tasks which boost their cognitive learning.

For example

, based on several surveys those offspring who did a diverse range of playful activities on their schedule had 30% higher grades on their course works.

Second,

the other possible outcome of

this

alteration is losing interest. To be more precise, a strict plan for sports would pose a negative tension in

kids

,

as a result

of high competition in a few sports like wrestling and judo, since the

kids

are not mature enough to distinguish between play and real

life

.

For instance

, my little son intensively hated taking part in the gym with a personal trainer but

in contrast

, he opted to go to the playground to play friendly with peers.

To sum up

, mandatory acts and exercises can cause discomfort in children. I believe that

this

statement tends to be unappealing, and

this

shift not only eradicates their aptitude for later

life

but

also

prevents them from their basic teaching requirements.

Therefore

, I find

this

change a negative alteration