In recent years, there has been a tremendous increase in the number of individuals questioning the consequences of using
the Correct article usage
show examples
popular
single-use
products
. One of the main dangers of
this
worrying trend is linked to their harmful effects on the environment.
However
, there are solutions readily available to tackle
this
issue
such
as the
government
banning any
further
use of these
products
.
To begin
, there is an argument to be made that
products
that are
to be used only once could potentially damage the
.
For example
, the usage of plastic bags has been contributing to global
warningCorrect your spelling
show examples
effects
such
as endangering
the Correct article usage
show examples
sea life, simply because they have caused more than 55,000 fish deaths only in 2014.
For
this
reason, it is evident that these
products
can threaten the
lifeFix the agreement mistake
show examples
of a considerably huge number of animals and plants, which inevitably disrupts the ecological balance in the environment. What is more, factories that
these
products
have impacted negatively the
areas through the release of toxins in the air or cutting off large green spaces, so they can continue their manufacturing
.
This
being the case, it can be assumed that if people persistently keep using these
products
, it would
determintallyCorrect your spelling
determinately
detrimentally
reduce the quality of living for all living creatures.
In order to resolve
this
troubling issue, one viable solution would be for the
government
to place immediate
on the use of these
products
.
For instance
, many countries started replacing plastic bags with paper ones, which has reduced the income of many plastic bag factories, and they have ceased their production
as a result
.
Therefore
,
it is clear that
local authorities should encourage the trend of using recyclable
products
instead
, which can drastically reduce the
overall
damaging impact of
single-use
products
.
Furthermore
, the
government
should increase the tax on these companies, to control their productivity and prevent the widespread of their
products
in the market. With
this
in mind, there is no doubt that if the
government
has taken
previouslyChange the word
show examples
plans to limit
single-use
products
,
this
would cease any significant damage to
environmentAdd an article
show examples
.
To conclude
, the overwhelming evidence seems to suggest that the abusive use of
single-use
products
hadWrong verb form
show examples
negativeAdd an article
show examples
impact on the quality of the
and
the Correct article usage
show examples
overall
life.
However
, it is still possible to turn the tide
byChange preposition
show examples
the Correct article usage
show examples
government
intervention to reduce the spread of the production of these
products
.