Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

transportation system is one of the most significant factors which describes the level of a nation's progress. a majority of people argue that national funds should be dedicated to improving the infrastructure of

railways

as they are more eco-friendly and economically effective. I completely agree with

this

idea and I will explain why in

this

essay.

to begin

with,

above all

features,

railways

are more eco-friendly,

as a result

of producing fewer amount of carbon emissions compared to road vehicles and mass transportation.

For instance

, trains and inner-city metros can transfer a high number of cargo and passengers in one journey.

in addition

, the connectivity and accessibility of all parts of nations through railway networks boost local economy and tourism,

therefore

, leading to regional development.

Furthermore

,

although

constructing roads is more convenient and cheaper, and

also

maintained for longer periods than trains, the rail systems are more economically justified.

for instance

, metros are very expensive for governments

due to

the high expenditures of building ways and purchasing facilities, but they can transfer thousands of people in a day, so the ticket sales will fulfil the financial requirements.

finally

, offering a reliable alternative transportation mode

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

reduces traffic congestion and leads to less time spent in traffic and a lower level of stress for individuals. In conclusion , it seems that

railways

are more essential infrastructures to improve people's lifestyles in terms of economy, environment and development, and authorities ought to devote a huge portion of their financial budgets to preserving and expanding

railways

.