Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is generally claimed that the
trains
are what the authorities should invest money in, not the highways. I completely agree with
this
statement, as not only is it the safer way of travelling but
also
it serves a wider spectrum of citizens. First of all,
trains
are the least dangerous method of transportation, as unfortunate incidents on the
railways
are a sporadic rarity. Evidence for
this
was provided in the recent report established by the World Transport Organization, which indicates that never has the annual number of accidents on
railways
exceeded that of collisions on the roads.
Therefore
,
it is clear that
the expansion of the
railways
might contribute to the safety of inhabitants.
Secondly
, railway
trains
undoubtedly fulfil the needs of a broad spectrum of people.
In other words
, travelling by train can target adults,
as well as
children or seniors, who are not able to ride a car by themselves.
For instance
, elderly people are often not capable of driving
due to
their health conditions, so a local train is their only possibility to either travel or simply get to a supermarket.
Similarly
, children, who are not old enough to get their driving license can comfortably use
trains
as their means of transportation to school.
Therefore
,
railways
are an investment which could satisfy the demands of many people.
To conclude
, I strongly believe that authorities should provide capital for new
railways
rather than highways because it is a safer method of transportation and satisfies the needs of a variety of citizens.
Submitted by gabadlugo on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Make sure to provide specific, real-world examples to support your arguments. While general statements on safety and demographics are included, mentioning particular studies, statistics, or tangible outcomes could strengthen your position.
coherence cohesion
Work on more sophisticated transitions and cohesive devices. While basic linking words are used, experimenting with a wider range of cohesive tools such as referencing, substitution, or ellipsis can enhance the flow of the essay.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: