In contemporary society, government funding has consistently been the topic of interest among the masses.
While
there are compelling arguments in favour of that rather than distributing budgets in the art industry, the
governments
should invest
this
money in public services, there are
also
significant reasons to approach it with scepticism. Despite recognizing the merits and drawbacks behind the viewpoint, I am inclined to oppose
this
perspective, as I believe our community need the power of arts and music.
It is clear that
numerous students now will choose computer science,physics or pharmacy as their major subject,
instead
of arts, acting or composition, because the salaries for
artists
, not famous actors and musicians are not stable at all. Obviously,
people
who work in the creative industry need government subsidies to maintain their standard of living. It can not be denied that sometimes the public cannot understand the meanings behind the paintings and songs, and think of how better if
governments
use those allowances to improve public transportation, children's education or urban planning. It is
therefore
reasonable that some
people
blame terrible public services on
governments
giving too much help to
artists
.
However
, the aforementioned perspectives overlook that
creativity
and imagination play a vital role in the human community.
For example
, the revolutionary invention of artificial intelligence ChatGPT was born on
creativity
, if inventors had not thought outside the box, human civilization could not have improved so quickly.
Additionally
,
creativity
can be a serious business, some scientists highlighted that rhythms and colourful paintings will enhance
people
's physical and mental health and recover more quickly from illness.
Thus
, it is vital for
governments
to support those creative
artists
, musicians and actors and provide them opportunities to share their experiences and life journies with the public.
Such
instances challenge the initial assertion, underscore the complexity of the perspective and support that it is important to lend hands to
artists
,
otherwise
,
people
's development will slow down.
In conclusion, reflecting upon the point of view that
governments
should invest the majority of budgets in public services
instead
of helping
people
work in the creative industry.
While
countries' infrastructures are important, it is crucial to acknowledge that human society needs
creativity
to improve and increase well-being. Given these considerations, my allegiance that I disagree with the perspective is steadfastly consolidated and incontrovertibly firm.