Some people say that the government should pay money for large pieces of art, like sculptures for public display in outdoor places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been said that government bodies should allocate financial resources for large-sized
art
exhibits such
as sculptures displayed in outdoor areas. From my perspective, whilst this
kind of art
is beneficial for tourism
, I largely disagree with this
statement.
On the one hand, tourism
can benefit from large-scale art
pieces
. In many public places, such
as parks or quarters, they facilitate the beauty of the surroundings, thereby attracting more visitors. Moreover
, grand artworks are likely to fuel tourism
, which correspondingly fosters local economic development. For instance
, many foreign tourists have visited the Temple of Literature in Hanoi to see big stone turtles with significant historical value, contributing to the revenue of the hotel industry. Ultimately, there are some motivations for the government to spend on large pieces
of art
regarding the socioeconomic field.
On the other hand
, spending on large outdoor pieces
of art
may be considered extravagant. Materials needed for big sculptures generally cost a substantial amount of money, which can otherwise
be invested in other facets of tourism
or the economy. Preserving historical buildings or artefacts could be taken as prime examples. Furthermore
, if sculptures are exhibited outdoors, they will be easily destroyed due to
their susceptibility to natural elements such
as high humidity or storms. Therefore
, additional funds are required for maintenance; otherwise
, they will inevitably be degraded and become public eyesores. Eventually, governmental expenditure on large outdoor artworks is seemingly inefficient.
In conclusion, large-scale art
pieces
can enhance tourism
and boost the local economy, I firmly believe that governments should prioritize spending on more sustainable and cost-effective endeavours due to
the high expenses and vulnerability of such
artworks in outdoor conditions.Submitted by chungoc2001 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Make sure your essay has a clear position throughout the response. While you presented both sides of the argument, ensuring your own stance is consistently clear can improve the coherence of your essay.
coherence cohesion
Enhance the logical structure of your essay by using more linking words and phrases that relate to cause and effect, contrast, and addition, to ensure seamless transitions between ideas.
task achievement
Develop your main points by giving more varied and detailed examples that support your arguments. This will help to make your essay more persuasive and impactful.
task achievement
Ensure that your conclusion effectively summarizes your viewpoint and the main points of the essay. While your conclusion is present, it should also reinforce the argument provided in a way that brings closure to your perspective.