Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view.

In recent decades, many researchers have studied the importance of

group

-level cognition. Indeed, there is no convincing evidence that

group

activities improve the intelligence of

individuals

.

This

essay will examine how research in team games and

study

groups

supports

this

view.

To begin

with, team games require

individuals

to perform a diverse range of rapid mental calculations.

This

is because players in a sporting context must predict and anticipate possible actions within tight time constraints.

For example

, a recent Cambridge

study

showed that soccer players could – within seconds – calculate over a dozen different permutations that could result from a single soccer-related action.

Such

predictive powers improve players' mental abilities and result from activities performed in a

group

context.

Secondly

,

study

groups

enable

individuals

to obtain information they could not acquire in isolation.

This

is because peer feedback allows

individuals

to refine their understanding of concepts and learn new information from other

study

group

members.

For example

, a

study

by The British Institute for Learning found that if

individuals

participated in

study

groups

, they had a far more objective and sophisticated understanding of a topic than learners not in

study

groups

.

Therefore

, it is undoubtedly the case that learning in a

group

improves an individual's mental abilities. In conclusion,

group

activities improve intellectual abilities. In the future, we will see schools take more significant measures to ensure that more

group

-level cognition occurs in the classroom.