Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Architectural decisions regarding newly constructed houses have become a subject of considerable discourse, pitting proponents of cultural
preservation
against advocates for individualistic design. This
essay will meticulously examine both perspectives and articulate a well-reasoned position.
On one end of the spectrum, proponents vehemently argue for the stringent preservation
of architectural heritage, positing that adherence to traditional local styles is paramount for the maintenance of cultural identity. They contend that a community's architectural legacy serves as a tangible link to its past, fostering a sense of continuity and shared history. This
perspective is particularly salient in regions where distinct architectural styles are emblematic of historical epochs or cultural epochs.
Conversely
, champions of individual freedom in design posit that imposing rigid constraints stifles creativity and impedes societal progress. In an era marked by globalization, individuals are increasingly exposed to diverse influences, and their homes are seen as a canvas for personal expression. Allowing residents the latitude to construct houses reflective of their individual tastes is perceived as an affirmation of the principle of autonomy and a celebration of the dynamism inherent in societal evolution.
In synthesizing these divergent views, it is evident that a nuanced approach is indispensable. The imposition of an absolutist stance, be it in favor
of cultural Change the spelling
favour
preservation
or unbridled individualism, risks oversimplifying a complex issue. Instead
, local authorities should craft judicious guidelines that harmonize the need for cultural continuity with the imperative of allowing for creative divergence.
In summation, the architectural design of newly built houses is an intricate matter that necessitates a judicious balance. To navigate the delicate terrain between cultural preservation
and individual autonomy, policymakers must strive for nuanced guidelines that encapsulate the essence of both perspectives.Submitted by ferdimasabrar2072 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Your essay presented a clear introduction and conclusion which set out your position effectively and rounded off the argument at the end, garnering a good score. To further enhance your introduction and conclusion, consider offering a brief preview of the viewpoints you will discuss in the introduction and a more explicit restatement of your thesis in the conclusion.
coherence cohesion
You have demonstrated good logical structure in your essay by presenting your arguments in a clear and organized manner. To improve further, consider using a wider variety of cohesive devices, such as synonyms and discourse markers that more explicitly signal contrasts or comparisons.
coherence cohesion
Main points in your essay are mostly well-supported, but to boost your score, ensure that each point is consistently backed up with specific examples. You can draw on case studies, real-life examples, or hypothetical scenarios to illustrate your arguments.
task achievement
You have completed the task and presented clear ideas that are mostly comprehensive. Enhance the completeness of your response by ensuring both views and your own opinion are fully developed. Spend a bit more time elaborating on your own position to ensure it is as well fleshed out as your discussion of the two views.
task achievement
To improve the task achievement score, incorporate more specific examples that are directly relevant to the question. While broad statements on autonomy and cultural preservation are valuable, providing concrete examples of architectural styles or real-world outcomes of housing policies would strengthen your argument and make it more tangible for the reader.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.