Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people argue that economic growth is the only solution to ending
poverty
and food insecurity, whereas
others think that it has detrimental effects on the environment and therefore
should be ended. In my perspective, both viewpoints are correct, but stopping it completely would not be a wise choice.
As a country’s economy thrives, the rate of hunger and poverty
can indeed be reduced along with
it. This
is because it creates job opportunities, increases income levels, and enhances access to important resources such
as food, healthcare, and education, contributing to the improvement of the overall
well-being and living standards of the population. Besides
, it also
stimulates investments in infrastructure, agriculture, or social welfare programs, which can directly benefit those suffering from poverty
. There are historical proofs that can support the link between economic prosperity and poverty
. For instance
, over the past few decades, countries like China, India, and many others have experienced significant economic expansion and have been able to lift millions of people out of poverty
.
However
, although
this
trend has numerous benefits, its potential downsides to the ecological system should not be overlooked. When a country succeeds economically, there will unarguably be more cars on the roads, more factories and companies will be established, and there will be higher demand for spare land, which are the main culprits of global problems like air pollution, resource depletion, and habitat loss. As a result
, not only do humans suffer, but different types of animals and plants’ lives are left in danger. But in my opinion, instead
of bringing the economy utterly to an end, countries should increase government spending on alternatives such
as renewables, sustainable agriculture, and life below water so that communities can flourish financially without needing to worry about the environment.
In conclusion, it is obvious that without the expansion of the economy, there would not be adequate job prospects, quality education, or healthcare, so it is important that governments seek other alternative ways to tackle environmental issues.Submitted by firdavsyuldashev111 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Task Achievement
Provide more detailed and specific examples to support your arguments. Rather than vaguely referencing historical proofs, cite concrete data or studies that illustrate the correlation between economic growth and poverty reduction.
Coherence and Cohesion
Consider varying your sentence structures to improve readability and flow. While your essay is coherent, more complex sentence forms can enhance your writing's sophistication.
Coherence and Cohesion
In the introduction and conclusion, explicitly state the essay's position on the matter to ensure clarity for the reader. While it's understood, making it absolutely clear could improve these sections.
Task Achievement
Balance both sides of the argument evenly. While your essay does touch upon both perspectives, ensure that each view is proportionally represented to demonstrate an unbiased discussion.