Nowadays, scientists and tourists have the possibility to travel to remote natural environments,
such
as the South Pole. Linking Words
This
recent discovery is a breakthrough in Linking Words
this
modern era, as it can lead to new findings and more innovations. Linking Words
However
, Linking Words
this
discovery has separated people’s opinions, especially related to the pros and cons. Linking Words
This
essay will discuss both views.
First of all, Linking Words
this
new breakthrough can give the world several benefits, Linking Words
such
as remote natural environments being protected and undisturbed by previous human activity. Linking Words
Furthermore
, it means that the originality of the living creatures that live there is safe. Scientists and data researchers can explore the kinds of habitats that live there and observe useful findings that can lead to the world’s innovations. Linking Words
This
argument is supported by a recent discovery by a scientist, where he found a new kind of bacteria trapped in an iceberg from more than a thousand years ago that has the possibility to make humans live longer.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, allowing tourists and other untrustworthy people to travel to previously isolated surroundings can Linking Words
also
lead to plenty of damage. Linking Words
Such
people can freely trash around and pollute the area, ending up causing troubles that harm the originality of the protected living. Linking Words
Moreover
, the hard work of the people who kept it safe will be gone by a few visits from tourists.
In conclusion, Linking Words
this
development has its own benefits and drawbacks. Linking Words
Hence
, it should be handled by professionals who can be trusted with protected living. Other than professionals should not be allowed to enter the remote natural environment as they have a bigger chance of harming Linking Words
such
a place.Linking Words
helma.devina