Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is argued that the government should invest in
railways
instead
of roads. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this
point of view because not only rail lines are more environmentally friendly but they also
prevent traffic jams.
Firstly
, funding railways
offers environmental benefits. Locomotives produce fewer emissions per ton-mile or passenger-mile compared to other means of transportation due to
the fact that they prevent the use of hundreds of internal combustion engines by carrying hundreds of people. Moreover
, many railways
use electric power, which is sourced from renewable energy such
as hydroelectric, solar or wind power. That’s the reason why investing in railways
can contribute to the reduction in
air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
Change preposition
of
Secondly
, the infrastructure of railways
can help alleviate road
congestion by providing alternative modes of transportation. A well-developed rail system that connects various destinations around a city can motivate a substantial portion of the population to move to trains or the metro because of their speed and punctuality, leading to the decrease of private on the road
and ultimately reducing traffic congestion, especially in densely populated areas. For example
, in Vietnam, the introduction of the Cat Linh metro in Hanoi in 2021 prompted a noticeable change in citizen behaviour, with a shift from using motorbikes to metros, resulting in reduced traffic jams. The government has plans to extend this
metro system to other major cities, with completion expected by 2030.
In conclusion, the government should invest more in the railway system than the road
because developed railways
positively impact the environment by reducing air pollution and preventing the greenhouse effect but also
effectively address road
congestion.Submitted by dthaphuong.21 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
While the essay presents a well-structured argument, consider enhancing the logical flow by adding more cohesive devices and varying conjunctions to improve the connections between ideas.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are well-defined, but try to elaborate a bit more on the concluding statement to make it more comprehensive and reflective of the overall discussion.
coherence cohesion
Your main points are supported, but integrating additional specific examples and data could strengthen your argumentation. Provide figures or studies to back up your points where possible.
task achievement
You've provided a complete response to the task with clear ideas. To further improve, ensure that each paragraph goes into detail about how the proposed measures address the specific considerations of the topic.
task achievement
Your ideas are fairly comprehensive, but expanding on each idea with more depth and nuance would enrich your essay. Delve deeper into the implications or challenges that might be associated with prioritizing railways over roads.
task achievement
Use relevant examples to support your points. While you did include an example (the Cat Linh metro in Hanoi), adding more examples from different contexts or countries would better demonstrate the general applicability of your argument.