Recently, there has been a significant amount of discussion surrounding the use of
in scientific experiments to develop new medicines and test the safety of various products.
some individuals argue that these experiments offer significant benefits, others firmly believe that they are morally objectionable and should be discontinued. In my view, I am inclined to support the idea of conducting tests on
before they are used by humans in order to mitigate potential risks.
, it is crucial to simultaneously promote the reproduction and preservation of all
On one hand, the practice of conducting experimental tests on
offers numerous advantages.
, testing medicines on
ensures the safety of these products when used by humans.
, scientists conduct extensive research, leading to advancements in medical science that result in innovative treatments and the preservation of human lives.
, the development of innovative medicines and unprecedented cures,
as those aimed at eradicating cancer cells, can lead to the flourishing of the medical sector and an increase in economic prosperity.
, in turn, contributes to the revitalization of the gross domestic product (GDP).
, the emergence of a new business attracts numerous individuals seeking opportunities, which
addresses various social issues
as health conditions, poverty, and ignorance.
On the other hand
, there are notable disadvantages associated with using
for experimental purposes. These activities may lead to a decline in biodiversity and the loss of animal
in both natural habitats and zoos.
as rabbits and mice may be adversely affected.
In conclusion, it is imperative for governments to take proactive measures to ensure the conservation of endangered animal
and to promote their reproduction.
the utilization of
in scientific experiments offers undeniable benefits, it is essential to strike a balance by addressing the potential negative impacts on biodiversity and animal populations.