Some people say that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops and public transport. Do you agree or disagree?

An increasing number of people have been discussing whether the utilization of

phones

should be forbidden or not. Some people agree with

this

idea,

however

, others may not be on the same wavelength.From my perspective, banning the

use

of

phones

is the most effective approach to show respect for the public environment. There are several advantages

of

Change preposition

to

show examples

not allowing the

use

of

phones

in public places. First of all, individuals can not only stay alert but

also

pay attention to

the

Change the word

their

show examples

surroundings.

For instance

, if someone commits a crime on public transportation, those who are not looking at their

phones

could be aware of the hostile atmosphere,

therefore

, they can prevent dangerous things happen to them. Next,it is noise-reducing to not play on those technological products.To illustrate, in libraries, where strict restrictions on the

use

of

phones

are supposed to exist, readers and users of these places can indulge in a tranquil and quiet environment.

Such

advantages can make the supporters advocate

this

idea.

However

, those who hold different opinions might contend that using

phones

is a modern lifestyle nowadays.

That is

to say, forbidding those smart tools can cause a lot of inconvenience. One argument is that we may have to keep numerous coins

due to

the limitation of e-payment. And for another viewpoint, citizens may find it difficult that cell

phones

are not allowed to be used when an emergency happens. In conclusion, even though some might disagree that banning the

use

of

phones

is the best idea to respect others. I personally would hold the belief that only through forbidding

phones

’ utilization, individuals can esteem public places.