The debate of whether a specific penalty should be devoted to every model of crime or the circumstances in which a culprit has been compelled to do the guilty deed should be considered, is a contentious one. Before stating my own opinion, I will assess both perspectives.
On the one hand, the existence of a penalty has its own drawbacks and benefits by which every potential criminal is aware of the consequences beforehand and in
this
situation, there will not be any excuse against the judge's verdict Linking Words
for example
; neglect or unawareness. Linking Words
Although
it would be a hindrance action in the community, it would cause some guilty people to guess their fine and punishment which is not acceptable. All around the world, there are plenty of culprits who repeat their crimes as they know the consequences that the government has enacted on them.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, the opponents contend that the background of doing unlawful action and every single reason ought to be taken into account because just in Linking Words
this
circumstance the court can reach a verdict fairly. Take a teenager who has stolen a loaf of bread to satiate himself as an example, if the referee condemns him to a harsh sentence Linking Words
as well as
a boss, Linking Words
reputation
for corruption, ordinary people will probably be disappointed regarding justice. What is more, Correct article usage
a reputation
such
forgiveness may result in an increasing rate of crime.
Linking Words
To conclude
, though the determined punishment could be an effective approach to simplify the judge's work, in my view, it is not the correct form of implementing justice in the community. Always the age of a criminal and the reason for doing a crime must be paid attention that the judge can say that he did based on both fairness and wisdomLinking Words
amirhossein7179