It is true that
traffic
and transportation are crucial issues that need to be addressed instantly. There is an argument that Use synonyms
people
should be encouraged to live in urban areas Use synonyms
instead
of suburbs. I disagree with the statement Linking Words
due to
the overpopulation in Linking Words
cities
and spreading inhabitants to other places. I will elaborate on Use synonyms
this
in my essay below.
Linking Words
Firstly
, the option to not encourage Linking Words
people
to live in Use synonyms
cities
is reasonable as overpopulation has already appeared in most big Use synonyms
cities
. Use synonyms
This
is because numerous Linking Words
people
migrate from rural areas in order to have more job opportunities. Use synonyms
For example
, it is prevalent that many conglomerates are located in enormous Linking Words
cities
Use synonyms
such
as New York or Washington for their own sake . Linking Words
As a result
, a large number of employees who work for them gather in one place, leading to Linking Words
traffic
congestion during high peak times.
Use synonyms
In addition
, the idea of spreading inhabitants is beneficial Linking Words
due to
reduced population density. Linking Words
This
can be explained by the fact that if Linking Words
people
can accept living in the countryside Use synonyms
instead
of depending on big Linking Words
cities
, Use synonyms
traffic
intensity could go down. Use synonyms
For instance
, when businesses see opportunities in other places, they will allocate factories, and take advantage of labourers and space. Linking Words
Consequently
, not only urban areas can provide better jobs for workers but locations around the country can offer that.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, namely overpopulation and job chances, I maintain that Linking Words
people
should not be forced to live in Use synonyms
cities
. It is advisable that the government support both individuals to decrease Use synonyms
traffic
jams.Use synonyms
nguyetcat.dao