With a growing world population, one of the most pressing issues is that of feeding such a large number of people. Some people think that GM foods offer a viable solution to this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is no denying that global

food

supply deprivation will happen if the world's population keeps growing exponentially. Some believe that scientifically produced

food

is a feasible remedy for

this

situation. Despite bringing about some opposing sides, employing

this

method in conventional agriculture will have a positive impact on alleviating global hunger. There is no denying that genetically modified foods are superior to traditional foods.

Firstly

, thanks to scientific breakthroughs in

this

field,

GM

crops become more resistant to harmful pests and insects than their conventional counterparts.

This

is because one armed with scientific development possesses specialized traits that help one gain an edge over traditional plants.

Additionally

, it must be acknowledged that climate change deters the growth of crops as these plants are subject to the weather and vulnerable to climatic catastrophes.

However

, regarding

GM

crops, these alternatives have a high tolerance to harsh environments

such

as drought, soil degradation, and flood.

Thus

, genetically engineered options can significantly increase annual

food

production, ameliorating

food

scarcity. Opponents of

this

trend argue that world hunger can persist despite employing foods originating from labs. There is a ubiquity of

GM

food

stereotypes, resulting in consumers rejecting

this

meal option as they are apprehensive about bacteria resistance and gene modification in their bodies.

This

point may be valid.

However

, recent trustworthy research has demonstrated that lab-grown

food

has little risk for humans.

Besides

that, the governments have implemented strict regulations and kept the process under surveillance to ensure no unexpected factors interrupt the production of

this

food

. In conclusion,

while

there is a concern about health risks, an incentive scheme to put

GM

food

into daily use is more critical

due to

its transcendent biological features.

Hence

, more financial resources should be attributed to

this

method because of its feasibility in ameliorating

food

insecurity.