Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some individuals consider that maintaining traditional

libraries

is not essential because going to the

libraries

is replaced by reading on a digital device.

While

this

notion is valid to a certain extent, I contend preserving public

libraries

will be improved because of some merits. On the one hand, having to maintain

libraries

causes some problems for the government and is not suitable for the trend.

Initially

, Maintaining

libraries

will cost the government money. It means that the government must spend a lot of money on

library

construction

as well as

maintain

Replace the word

maintenance

show examples

and repair

the

Change preposition

of the

show examples

library

facilities

instead

of using

money

Add an article

the money

show examples

for

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

charity.

Secondly

, nowadays people often choose to read

e-book

Fix the agreement mistake

e-books

show examples

. People can read books anywhere, anytime and they will be able to search for the books which they want to read easily by searching for the book's keywords.

On the other hand

,

libraries

still play an important role these days. First and foremost,

libraries

are where readers can enjoy a better reading experience. They will not be distracted by social networking applicants or some noises of transport and they can better focus on their book.

Moreover

, The

library

is a place to preserve valuable works that are hard to find. Like the National

Library

of Ho Chi Minh City, there are documents about the history of Vietnam,

in-depth

Correct word choice

and in-depth

show examples

books on historical topics that we cannot find online. In conclusion,

although

computers can replace traditional

libraries

in a few aspects of reading, there are more compelling reasons why

libraries

should be kept.