Some countries are struggling with an increase in crime rates. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Crime incidence has increasingly risen in many countries, threatening the lives of countless people. There is a belief that employing more
police
in surveillance is the only way to prevent individuals from committing crimes. Despite bringing about short-term benefits, I am apprehensive about
this
decision. The increasing presence of
police
undoubtedly contributes to reducing crime rates in the short run.
This
is because
such
people act as an embodiment of justice, and strict punishments directly deter those who tend to contravene the law and behave illegally.
Furthermore
, those who are law-breakers opt for places or areas where the reach of law enforcement is weak enough to commit a serious
offense
Change the spelling
offence
show examples
.
Therefore
. Reinforcing the supervision of
police
in crime-infested places, it can cause illegal
behaviors
Change the spelling
behaviours
show examples
to plummet as these executions soon be detected. Take Rio de Janeiro,
for instance
; thanks to initiatives of deploying more
police
implemented by the government,
this
policy culminates in peace for residents living in
this
city.
However
,
this
policy demonstrates no prolonged efficiency. As there are no solutions to tackle the root cause of the crimes,
this
social quo still proliferates when human resources of
police
stations cannot afford to supervise all areas 24/7.
Thus
, in lieu of allocating financial resources to
police
reinforcement, the government should invent these monetary subsidies to address factors
such
as poverty, lack of education, and mental health issues contributing to criminal
behaviors
Change the spelling
behaviours
show examples
.
Additionally
,
this
approach to curtail crime can be counter-intuitive as
this
raises a question about integrity. Numerous serious crimes that expose
police
corruption are recorded around the world. People who want to infringe on a law bribe the
police
to turn a blind eye, resulting in more criminal actions. In conclusion,
while
leading to positive change immediately, the lack of sustainable effectiveness is the crucial reason why increasing
police
patrolling is not necessary.
Hence
, educational and social investment is the holistic approach to address
this
situation.
Submitted by [email protected] on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Coherence and Cohesion
To enhance your coherence and cohesion, aim for a more seamless transition between paragraphs. Try using linking phrases that not only connect ideas within paragraphs but also between them. This will make your essay flow more naturally and be easier to follow.
Task Response
In terms of task response, while you've covered the question well, integrating a wider range of specific examples and evidence would strengthen your argument. Consider including relevant statistics, studies, or historical events to support your points more robustly.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • tackle crime
  • crime prevention
  • law enforcement
  • root causes
  • community involvement
  • cooperation
  • innovative technology
  • crime rates
  • social programs
  • education
  • employment
  • support
What to do next:
Look at other essays: