It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaurs, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?

The natural extinction of certain animals is thought to be inevitable and mankind has no responsibility to alter

this

outcome.

While

it is true that some disappearances are unavoidable, I partly believe that humanity’s

endeavor

Change the spelling

endeavour

show examples

to thwart

this

grim fate is not futile. First and foremost, no matter how much effort is devoted, several animals are bound to perish

due to

natural selection or human doings. Nature’s great filter has operated for millions of years and countless species that are unable to evolve

accordingly

are destined to die out. Some people argue that all attempts to put an intervention to

this

process are merely preposterous. An empirical example of

this

is the extinction of the thylacine, an omnivorous animal formerly found in Australia; they were wiped out

at the end

of

20th

Correct article usage

the 20th

show examples

century

due to

habitat loss and food scarcity, in spite of the tenacious aid from humans. The changes we made to

this

world are

also

a

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

culprit

Fix the agreement mistake

culprits

show examples

contributing to the vanishing of numerous beings. In the name of developments, humanity is putting innumerable lives at stake with pollution and rising global temperature. Unfortunately, the sheer damage done to the habitats of many creatures like rainforests, oceans or polar regions is irreversible in decades to come, which is too short of a time span for them to evolve, eventually causing them to become extinct.

On the other hand

, there is no dispute that mankind must bring

this

process to a halt, no matter the cost. It is simply their responsibility to take after all the devastation they have inflicted around the globe.

This

planet has been for both people and other creatures to share side by side in the past, present,

future

Correct word choice

and future

show examples

.

Hence

it is inhumane to make other beings suffer the ruin of industrialization when we have been coexisting for thousands of years. Apart from moral rationale, the biological diversity and food chain are impaired substantially from animals’ extinction.

For instance

, were a common species of prey

such

as rabbits or hares eradicated, many dependent predators would live a life in starvation, waiting for a foreseeable demise. Humanity can certainly mitigate

this

by appropriate regulations and preservation given to endangered species to sustain a diverse ecosystem. In conclusion,

although

it may seem unavailing to prevent the annihilation of some animals, there are concrete moral and scientific motivations for humans to prolong the

overall

population of any other creatures.