Healthcare is a universal right and should be guaranteed by the government. To what extent you agree or disagree with the given statement?

It is a popular belief that

healthcare

should be funded by the State in order to give everybody access to medical treatment.

This

essay will argue that

this

statement is a very agreeable one because, if hospitals and meds supply are guaranteed by the government, the level of public

health

will increase and, if not, the poorest

people

will have difficulties getting the cures they need. In order to improve the

health

of the citizens, the public authority should heavily fund the

healthcare

system. It is trivial to say that, without the proper resources, it would not run efficiently because of the lack of doctors, facilities and medical goods.

For example

, in countries where hospitals are greatly subsidized,

such

as Norway,

people

have access to their services for a price which is many times lower than in other nations. Private

healthcare

can be considered a form of discrimination against low-income families. Indeed, having to pay high prices can make many

people

refuse to cure themselves, which is very detrimental to them.

On the other hand

, we know that, as proven by famous

health

economics studies,

such

as those conducted by Kenneth Arrow, private

healthcare

systems have a tendency to not reach efficiency because of structural market failures. Proof of

that is

the United States, where many

people

cannot afford expensive medical treatments. Many

people

think that being

healthcare

a necessity for everyone, and it should be guaranteed by the government.

This

essay has discussed that, since

such

an action by the government is beneficial for public

health

and the rightfulness of society,

this

argument should be considered to be a very strong and consistent one.