Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In the digital age, the debate between unrestricted
information
sharing and the need to protect sensitive
data
is increasingly relevant. I believe in the careful protection of valuable
information
. The proponents of open
information
sharing highlight its role in fostering
innovation
and collaboration. They argue that
access
to a wide array of
data
accelerates research, democratizes knowledge, and potentially reduces costs.
For example
, in academia, the necessity to
access
multiple paid resources for a
single term
Add a hyphen
single-term
show examples
paper underscores the limitations and financial burdens of restricted
information
access
. Open sharing is posited to not only facilitate more inclusive research but
also
to significantly improve efficiency and productivity across various sectors.
However
, I would argue that it is more important to protect sensitive
information
. Unrestricted
access
could lead to dire consequences,
such
as security breaches that compromise personal and national safety, intellectual property theft that stunts
innovation
, and even endanger national security.
For instance
, the leakage of military technology to hostile entities could drastically undermine a nation's
defense
Change the spelling
defence
show examples
capabilities.
Furthermore
, the theft of proprietary research from a pharmaceutical company could halt the development of life-saving drugs. Protecting sensitive
data
is crucial not just for safeguarding competitive edges or proprietary technologies but
also
for preserving the very foundation of
innovation
and creativity. In conclusion,
while
the sharing of
information
is crucial for advancement, a judicious approach to the protection of sensitive and valuable
data
is imperative.
This
ensures a harmonious balance between
innovation
and security.
Submitted by fiasngs on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Your essay has a strong structure and clear argumentation, maintaining a logical flow throughout. To further enhance coherence, try to create even smoother transitions between paragraphs and ideas.
task achievement
You've responded comprehensively to the task, presenting a balanced view before giving your opinion. To elevate your score, integrate more diverse and specific examples that directly support your arguments.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • information sharing
  • scientific research
  • business
  • academic world
  • advancement of knowledge
  • progress
  • collaboration
  • cross-disciplinary research
  • open access
  • democratization of information
  • transparency
  • credibility
  • intellectual property
  • security concerns
  • commercial interests
What to do next:
Look at other essays: