Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment, such as course work and projects, is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Education provides practice with a variety of methods to assess the performance of their

students

. Final

exams

are accepted as the most efficient method to evaluate a student's educational readiness as interim assessments

such

as use cases, group exercises and individual

projects

do not live up to the minimum requirements. It is my contention that formal

exams

alone cannot validate the reliability of test outcomes since a hybrid evaluation model is the most pragmatic and modern solution in

this

industry. First and foremost,

although

formal examinations have been utilized as a way to measure the education compatibility of a student, new technology and tools necessitate a distinctive approach to make these assessments more successful.

Furthermore

, final

exams

are usually held

at the end

of each year or semester, forcing

students

to be overwhelmed by learning and refreshing the previously gained information during a compacted timeline.

Consequently

,

this

deteriorates the quality of the assessment creating a margin for cheating and fraud to pass the bar during the

exam

. To exemplify

this

statement, many

students

do not bother to learn a single subject until the

exam

sessions and

then

suddenly they put a huge effort into studying all subjects just to not fail an

exam

. So to say they only acquire targeted and fleeting information.

Moreover

, I think it is a prudent method to conduct hybrid education assessments both during and

at the end

of curriculums.

For instance

,

this

may involve the utilization of use cases and group

projects

to boost the understanding of

students

into the subject

whereas

a final

exam

will be fulfilled by each person to ratify his/her readiness. To set an example, at our university, we experienced unique subject-based

projects

to hone both social and technical skills,

while

furnishing performance results to the teachers. In conclusion, despite formal

exams

still being rigorously tested by teachers at universities to measure someone's level of knowledge of certain topics, I totally advocate the notion that more precise measurements can be implemented by putting practices like group exercises and

projects

into operation.