some people believe that taxing is best way to reduce the industrial pollution.While some suggest there are several other ways to solve this trouble. Discuss both the views and give you opinion.

The impact of industrial
pollution
has infiltrated almost all aspects of our lives. Whilst it is debated by individuals that through exerting high taxes on factories we can achieve maximum effectiveness, others share a different belief as there are alternative solutions that can generate more promising results. It is my contention that
although
taxing
companies
that ignore proper
pollution
control measurements slightly diminishes the scale of damage, more radical alternatives should be put in place to cease any mismanagement of
pollution
policies. First and foremost, the practice of taxing
companies
to regulate their businesses that pollute the
environment
with toxic gasses and substances has a long history regardless of its effectiveness. A majority of governments use
tax
as a tool to somewhat compensate for the hazards originating from factories and plants.
Consequently
,
companies
decide to establish better
pollution
management practices to evade high
tax
costs that might be exerted by governments.
Nevertheless
,
companies
that are operating on a
high-profit
Correct your spelling
high profit
show examples
margin, seem to care less about these impacts ,
therefore
, they misuse
this
tax
as a cheat code to uphold their wrongdoings pertaining to environmental contamination.
For example
, oil and gas
companies
are among the
companies
with record
tax
payments
due to
their massive negative impact on the global
environment
.
On the other hand
, I hold the opinion that
tax
is just a mitigation effort to convince certain modest-level
companies
to be more environmentally sensitive by incurring green investments to erase their footprints from the
environment
. To exemplify my statement, I believe
instead
of sending
tax
expenses to the
companies
that pollute flora and fauna, governments should unconditionally shut down the existing business operations. Resultantly,
companies
that used to leverage the
pollution
tax
system will commence starting environmental remediation actions
as well as
adding the
environment
to the list of business objectives. In conclusion, despite taxing
companies
may assist us in decreasing the level of
pollution
,
however
Add a comma
however,
show examples
taking drastic measures can dissipate the remaining scepticism and ignorance of environmental policies once and for all.
Submitted by orkhanshamil on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Coherence & Cohesion
Ensure a clear, logical flow throughout the entire essay. Make use of transitional phrases adequately but strive for a smoother connection between ideas for improved readability.
Coherence & Cohesion
Integrate a wider range of linking devices to enhance the essay's cohesion further. This includes contrasting connectors and exemplification phrases that are diverse.
Task Achievement
While your essay adequately responds to all parts of the task with a clear position, aim to provide more specific examples to strengthen your arguments. Broad or generalized examples are less persuasive than concrete, detailed instances.
Task Achievement
Work on developing your paragraphs with balanced arguments. Each should have a clear main idea supported by specific examples or reasons. Avoid overly generalized statements that do not advance the argument.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: