A group of
believe that
should be spent on fast-moving vehicles.
, others are in
favorChange the spelling
show examples
that the government should focus more on environmental development. I will discuss both views in
essay below.
, in my opinion, the
who consider that
should be spent on the
are more advantageous.
with, a group of
want the ministry to facilitate them with the best transport
fast and convenient so that they can reach their destination with ease.
congestion, it is hard for most of the public to reach their office, school, and work on
. When they spend more on
campaigns they facilitate their
so they can easily get ready at home and feel free to move from their home on
.
nowadays
heavy traffic, they leave their homes in a rush without having their breakfast.
, if they make fast-moving vehicles
have more
to spend quality
together. In most of the European region, they spread a chain of underground, electric trams to it help them to reach their destination at the
.
On the flip side, some
want the government should pay a good amount to make their surroundings neat and clean. It is a good option because when they focus on the
the rate of respiratory disease automatically decreases and the
who are suffering from them become more relaxed.
, it is better to spend on the
if the government spends more
on planting trees it will help
to live in clean surroundings and breathe more oxygen with reduced harmful effects.
,
living in northern areas where they live in an open
where there are large numbers of trees have a positive effect on their lives and their lungs stay stronger and pollution-free as compared to the
who are living in urban areas their lungs become damaged because they inhale poisonous gases.
In conclusion, it is undeniable fact that both views have their importance but in my opinion, spending
is more beneficial for
because it helps them to live longer and stay stronger without having any respiratory illness
as asthma, cough and shortness of
breathinessReplace the word
show examples
.