Teenagers should have regular exams at secondary school, as this will prepare them better for life after leaving school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Conducting assessments at post-secondary schools is an important feature of education.

However

, there is debate as to whether

exams

prepare

students

for the future. I would agree they do and elaborate on my points in the following paragraphs. To commence with, periodic assignments develop some great skills in

students

.

Subsequently

, they learn discipline, time management, and stress management, to tackle pressure.

For instance

,

students

are to perform in the given time period in the real

exams

where they learn real-life skills

such

as working under pressure to meet deadlines at the workplace after school.

On the other hand

, evaluation is not always the best method to test a child's ability. Schools evaluate a learner based on the syllabus which is imposed by the education system only, where an adult's performance is determined on the basis of makers he/she gets in the

exams

. From a real-life example, in India, some

students

are really good at studies but sometimes they are not able to perform well in their

exams

owing to many reasons

thus

they are pressurised by society

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and family members. In conclusion, I acknowledge that

exams

are stressful and hinder the growth of a child.

However

, I would argue that children should be given

exams

so they can adopt lifelong skills and perform better in the workplace or at universities.