Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities, privately owned vehicles should be banned in city centers, while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution. discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Traffic

jam is a serious

problem

that commonly happens in a

city

.

While

some

people

consider that the government should ban privately owned

vehicles

in

city

centres

to overcome the

congestion

problem

, I side with those thinking

that is

an unrealistic way to solve the

problem

. On the one hand, it could be argued that privately owned

vehicles

should be banned in the centre of cities can pose two challenges.

Firstly

, it can be difficult to prohibit

vehicles

since nowadays there are a huge number of

vehicles

. If it is forbidden, it will raise the

problem

of

congestion

in other areas.

As a result

, the regulation will not solve the

problem

but

then

create the same

problem

.

Secondly

, when privately owned

vehicles

are prohibited in

city

centres

, it will raise society's revolt especially they are who live in rural areas where no public transport is available.

People

will be in a hard situation as they can not go to

city

centres

with their

vehicles

and at the same time, they are impossible to go by public transport.

On the other hand

, I believe with those who think that

ban

Replace the word

banning

show examples

privately owned

vehicles

in

city

centres

is an unrealistic solution.

Although

that policy will reduce

traffic

congestion

and air pollution significantly, the government and any other parties involved should really consider what is the main cause of

congestion

in cities. In my opinion,

traffic

jams happen mainly because

people

already find comfort in transporting on their own. So, rather than ban the

vehicles

, the government should build a

convenience

Replace the word

convenient

show examples

public transportation that will attract

people

to use it. If they can do that, society's habit slowly will change to prefer using public transportation since it gives them many benefits.

Furthermore

, the policy of prohibiting privately owned

vehicles

from operating in

city

centres

is quite impossible since there

is

Change the verb form

are

show examples

numerous businesses that

has

Change the verb form

have

show examples

their stores in the

city

.

People

can find it difficult to access the stores if they can not commute easily. In conclusion,

while

forbidding privately owned

vehicles

in

city

centers

Change the spelling

centres

show examples

might reduce

traffic

jams and air pollution, it does not solve the problems since the main causes are not well executed.

Moreover

, it has more drawbacks than benefits that can we imagine.

Therefore

, on balance, I remain firmly convinced that it is an unrealistic solution.